Home > Carnegie Classifications
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education™
In 1970, the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education developed a classification
of colleges and universities to support its program of research and policy analysis.
Derived from empirical data on colleges and universities, the Carnegie Classification
was published for use by other researchers in 1973, and subsequently updated in 1976,
1987, 1994, 2000, and 2005. For over three decades, the Carnegie Classification has
been the leading framework for describing institutional diversity in U.S. higher
education. It has been widely used in the study of higher education, both as a way
to represent and control for institutional differences, and also in the design of
research studies to ensure adequate representation of sampled institutions, students,
or faculty.
With the 2005 revision, the single classification system was replaced by a set of
multiple, parallel classifications. The new classifications provide different lenses
through which to view U.S. colleges and universities, offering researchers greater
flexibility in meeting their analytic needs. They are organized around three fundamental
questions: what is taught (Undergraduate and Graduate Instructional Program
classifications), who are the students (Enrollment Profile and Undergraduate Profile),
and what is the setting (Size & Setting). The original Carnegie Classification
framework—now called the Basic classification—has also been substantially
revised.
Another change is the introduction
of “elective” classification. Unlike classifications based on secondary
analysis of existing national data, elective classifications rely on voluntary
participation by institutions, permitting analysis of attributes that are not
available in the national data. The first elective classification, released in
December 2006, focuses on community engagement.
The menus above provide access to extensive documentation as well as tools
for looking up specific institutions, listing all institutions in a particular
classification category, aggregating categories within a classification, and
examining points of intersection across two or more classifications.
More
Related Articles
"Hidden In Plain View,"
Inside Higher Ed, May 10, 2007
(subject: comparison groups in
U.S. News college rankings).
Read article
"Rethinking and Reframing the Carnegie Classification,"
Change, September-October 2005
Read article (PDF)